Categories >> Politics and Latest News >> Reza Shah Pahlavi and the unprovoked Allied invasion of Iran during WWII >> War >> Middle East >> Iran >> History >>

by: Nema Alborz - posted (or last updated): 3rd, June 2009

Reza Shah Pahlavi and the unprovoked Allied invasion of Iran during WWII

Occupation: Nursing

Age: 23
Last Login: Yesterday
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
" I always appreciate comments/suggestions. thanks. ." Nema

History tells all if you go back far enough.

You could go back to 1813 and the Treaty of Gulistan, under which Persia was forced to concede territory to Russia. The treaty was put together by British diplomat Sir Gore Ouseley and is regarded as a humiliation in Iran. The myth - or reality - of the devious British was established. Britain was also instrumental in setting Iran's borders with India in the 1860s.

Then in the 1920s, British forces in Iran under General Edmund Ironside (later British land forces commander in World War II after Dunkirk) helped put Reza Shah on the Peacock throne. His son was Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, the Shah overthrown in the Islamic revolution of 1979, so there is a direct link back to British actions decades ago.

InAugust 1941, the Allied powers Britain, United States, and the Soviet Union invaded and occupied Iran by a massive air, land, and naval assault. They justified this by alleging that the Reza Shah had refused to allow Iranian territory to be used to train, supply, and act as a transport corridor by the Allied forces. Reza Shad had declared neutrality and wished to stay out of the war.

The Allies did not accept this neutrality and invaded Iran without any respect for its sovereignty in order to ship arms to Russia for its war effort against Germany. Because of its importance in the allied victory, Iran was subsequently called "The Bridge of Victory" by Winston Churchill.

 

Stalin and Churchill in military uniform, Roosevelt in suit meet in Tehran after invasion of Iran, 1941

Upon occupation of Iran, the British forced the Reza Shah to abdicate in favor of his son, a 21 year old boy with no knowledge of politics or statesmenship. The British wanted this inexperienced young man as their puppet so they could continue to rape the countries enormous natural resources and benefit from its geopolitical importance.

During Reza Shah's sixteen years of leadership, major infrastructural developments took place in Iran, most often under his direct supervision.

There were many large road and housing construction projects and the Trans-Iranian Railway were built, modern education was introduced and the University of Tehran was established. The number of modern industrial plants, increased nearly 20 fold under Reza Shah, the number of miles of highway increased from 1900 to 14,300.

 

Reza Shah is the tall man in the center.

In addition to the modernization drive of the nation, Reza Shah was the leader during the time of the Women's Awakening (1936-1941) which sought the elimination of the Islamic veil from Iranian society. Modern Iranian women believed that the veil impaired their ability to enter society and contribute to the progress of the nation and be regarded as an equal by men. The unveiling issue and the Women's Awakening are linked to the Marriage Law of 1931 and the Second Congress of Eastern Women in Tehran in 1932.

The British watching these development remotely, expressed concern in the British parliament and suggested that Reza Shah's policies of modernization is against British interests and they would much prefer for Iran to remain as is so that it would be easier to rule the region and Iran's developments may entice other countries to follow similar trends. The British never hesitated to express their displeasure for Reza Shah and held intense views of resentment towards him.

As his reign became more secure, Reza Shah clashed with Iran's clergy, the Islamic class of Iran, and devout Muslims on many issues. In December 1928 he instituted a law requiring everyone (except Shia jurisconsults who had passed a special qualifying examination) to wear Western clothes which angered many religious figures in Iran and angered devout Muslims. The Shah also encouraged women to discard the veil and stop hejab (head and body covering a woman under the rules of Islam). He announced that female teachers could not longer come to school with head coverings. One of his daughters reviewed a girls' athletic event with an uncovered head and this angered the religious right even more.

The devout were also angered by policies which allowed mixing of the sexes. Women were allowed to study in the colleges of law and medicine and in 1934 a law set heavy fines for cinemas, restaurants, and hotels that did not open doors to both sexes. He restricted public mourning observances to one day and required mosques to use chairs during these observances instead of the traditional sitting on the floors of mosques. This was indeed a detailed modernization agenda even if at times it was too much too soon and needed more time to be introduced and widely accepted. However, many scholars have since expressed that Reza Shah's speeches to the parliament indicated that he had perceived the seeds of a new war in Europe and Iran needs to be economically, militarily, and politically better prepared to avoid being sucked into the war.

Reza Shah believed in independence and neutrality in matters of foreign relations and did not have any desire to participate in global polarization and worked to balance British influence with other foreigners and generally to diminish foreign influence in Iran altogether. Again this irritated the British immensely.

On 21 March 1935, Reza Shah had issued a decree asking foreign delegates to use the term Iran in formal correspondence in accordance with the fact that Persia was a term used for a country identified as Iran in the Persian language. It has however contributed more to the Iranian people than others, particularly its language. The name Iran means “Land of the Aryans”. The British assumed that this may be somehow an indication of Iranian leader's desire to become closer with the Aryan race of Germany.

In 1931, Reza Shah refused to allow British Imperial Airways to fly in Persian airspace, instead giving the concession to German-owned Lufthansa Airlines and later surprised the British by unilaterally canceling the oil concession awarded William Knox D’Arcy (then called Anglo-Persian Oil Company), which was slated to expire in 1961.

The concession granted Persia (which what Iran used to be named) 16% of the net profits from AIOC oil operations. The Shah wanted 21%. Following a brief challenge by the British before the League of Nations, the British acquiesced. However in 1972 the Vice President of British Petroleum confessed that the British were taking more than 99% of the profits from Iranian oil and giving less than 1% to Iran - and even then the money was directed towards British supporters in Iran rather than the whole population. The Iranians were not allowed to review or audit the accounting books of AIOC (the so called Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, now known as British Petroleum).

Reza Shah had previously hired American consultants to develop and implement Western-styled financial and administrative systems, which included the U.S. Economist, Dr. Arthur Millspaugh who acted as the nation's Finance Minister.

Reza Shah also purchased ships from Italy and hired Italians to teach his troops the intricacies of naval warfare. He also began bringing in hundreds of German technicians and advisors for various mining and roadwork projects. Mindful of the Persian’s long period of subservience to British Empire's enormous military power and the Russian brutal conduct as Iran's neighbor, Reza Shah was careful to avoid giving any one foreign nation too much control.

He also insisted that foreign advisors be employed by the Persian government so that they would not be answerable to foreign powers. This was based upon his experience with Anglo-Persian which was owned and operated by the British government and has caused problems for Iran for more than a century.

In his campaign against foreign influence he annulled the 19th century capitulations to Europeans in 1928. Under these, Europeans in Iran had enjoyed the privilege of being subject to their own consular courts rather than to the Iranian judiciary. The right to print money was moved from the British Imperial Bank to Iran's National Bank (Bank-i Melli Iran), as was the administration of the telegraph system from the Indo-European Telegraph Company to the Iranian government, in addition to the collection of customs by Belgian officials. He eventually fired Millspaugh, and prohibited foreigners from administering schools, owning land or traveling in the provinces without police permission. To many Intellectual Iranians of the time, Reza Shah was indeed an Iranian hero and all his achievements were a testament to his strong character and love for Iran and her people.

Of course this is precisely what empires despise and find threatening: a sovereign nation's independence and self-sufficiency.

When Britain declared war on Germany, it was bad news for Iran. Reza Shah's foreign policy, which had consisted essentially of playing the Soviet Union off against Britain, failed when those two powers joined in 1941 to fight the Germans and supply the Soviet forces with war material through Iran. Hence the two allies, along with United States, jointly attacked, invaded, and occupied the country in August 1941, with Franklin D. Roosevelt's blessings.

The British insisted that Reza Shah must abdicate and he remained as a prisoner in British territories, first in Mauritius, then in Durban and finally in Johannesburg, South Africa, where he died on July 26, 1944.

 
WritersViews.com is a community web site dedicated to writers and friends, our 16,000+ members. Regarded as one of the most professional and well-organized online communities, it offers posting of articles and opinion, group discussions, local meetups, free hosting of your content, free E-Commerce web hosting & merchant account for selling your books, content or commercial writing, free workshops, video chat, polls, job postings, freelance projects, and classified ads, ... AND, it is all FREE.

Rate this Post / Article :

Email this Page to your friend :

Share this Post / Article with your friends :

Other Related Articles :

Dehumanization of a country and its people. - 1,961 (last 30 days)
Dr. Mossadegh: Times Man of the Year for 1951. - 1,827 (last 30 days)
Reza Shah Pahlavi: An Unprovoked Allied Invasion of Iran. - 1,644 (last 30 days)
Mujahedin Khalq Organization: The terrorists among us. - 1,509 (last 30 days)
Winston Churchill: History speaks but does it matter? - 836 (last 30 days)
Winston Churchill: Mass murder of anti-Communist civilians.- 410 (last 30 days)

More >>

Other Articles Posted by this Writer : Writer's Portfolio >>

 
 
 
All ideas or comments made are the views of the writers themselves, and not the community organizers or other members and protected by FREEDOM OF SPEECH, recognized as human right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as stated in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. WritersViews.com does not make any warranties or representations in any way, whatsoever.
posted by: Parvaneh Rahee  - 3rd, June 2009 at 7:33 am
For a man who did so much for his country it is sad how he died in exile in Johannesburg of South Africa in 1944 instead of his beloved country. There is a group of Iranians that meet in north Tehran every year to casually discuss a plan to go to UK an urinate on Churchill grave in St Martin's Parish Church, Bladon, Oxfordshire. Not sure how serious they are, ... More >>
posted by: Jim Abrams   - 3rd, June 2009 at 7:33 am
Whether you agree with him or not, Reza Shah did many good things for Iran. As the Prime Minister of the new government in 1923, he negotiated the evacuation of the British forces stationed in Iran since the end of World War I in 1924. I wonder why the world does not hate the British as much as U.S. is hated? We were never as bad as the British,... More >>
posted by: Allison Knight - 3rd, June 2009 at 7:33 am
Why did the British attacked Iran during the first world war? Was Iran involved in the war or helped or assisted any sides, ... More >>
posted by: Parvaneh Rahee - 3rd, June 2009 at 7:33 am
Iran declared its neutrality, but ended up as a battleground for Russian, Turkish, and British troops. A group of Iranian notables led by Nezam os Saltaneh Mafi, hoping to escape Anglo-Russian dominance but failed to capture much support, ... More >>
posted by: Davood Sattree - 3rd, June 2009 at 7:33 am
British foreign secretary, Lord Curzon, proposed an agreement to retain their control of Iranian affairs and bribed and coerced the Iranian prime minister, Vosuq od-Dowleh, and two members of his cabinet. The Anglo-Persian Agreement of 1919 was widely viewed as establishing a British protectorate over Iran until Reza Shah seized power, ... More >>
 
 
 
 
MOST POPULAR POSTS / ARTICLES :
3 things you must do if you want to get a job in the next 90 days, Guide - by: Fiona Harper - 7,648 (last 30 days)
Weekend Getaways: Break away, and have fun, on a low budget? - by: Ava Thomas - 7,042 (last 30 days)
Greatest American Sports Story: Determination, Glory, Heartbreak - by: Michael Daniel - 6,890 (last 30 days)
Energy Technology: Four million new high-paying jobs in the next 6 years! - by: Ashley Jones - 6,719 (last 30 days)
Mortgage foreclosures, credit cards, student loans, stocks, what next? - by: Grace Tayler - 5,011 (last 30 days)
Insomnia: Causes & Treatment - by: Chantelle Bell - 4,961 (last 30 days)
President Barak Obama policies - by: Ryan Hogan - 2,872 (last 30 days)
Superfoods: Love your body - by: Mary Ireland - 2,685 (last 30 days)
Whose pain? and Whose gain? - by: Leila Hamadani - 2,374 (last 30 days)
The New American Century ! - by: Emily Sumner - 1,649 (last 30 days)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009. All rights reserved and enforced regularly by monitoring illegal reproductions and copyright infringements.
Violating our copyrights can make you liable for up to $150,000 in court-awarded damages.
No information on this site may be copied or republished in any way, whatsoever, without express written consent.
 
Every day, people just like you, come to WritersViews.com web site to read or share ideas and comments. WritersViews.com community organizers and members can not make any representations or claims as to the validity, correctness, currency, completeness or timeliness of the Information, Ideas, or Comments posted in this web site, or at any links to external site. All ideas or comments made are the views of the writers themselves, and not the community organizers or other members and protected by FREEDOM OF SPEECH, recognized as human right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as stated in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. WritersViews.com does not make any warranties or representations in any way, whatsoever. The reader assumes sole responsibility for the selection and use of or reliance on the Information contained in this web site or the members' area, and full responsibility for any or all interaction with other members.